Did LOCKE really get IT?

How accurate is his understanding and description of human nature? Given his assumptions about human nature, how well did he understand humans and their use of power? If Locke had known Hotspur would his theory have been different? Consider Falstaff's impact on the unfolding of events; do his actions and motivation confirm or undermine Locke's assumptions? How well do Henry IV and Hal represent Locke's theory about leadership, acquisition and use of power?

HOUSE of PAINE

Thomas Paine claimed to "offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense" in his dialogue with the American colonists. In context of your discussion of Locke and the events in England of the 1390s, what are the simple facts, plain arguments and common sense that motivate the actions and decisions of the players?